Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Olivares Venegas v. McLean County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jonathan B Olivares Venegas
Respondent:
McLean County Sheriff Office and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crenshaw v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Holzer, . Edger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Chambers et al
as 1:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Bryant Hart
Defendant:
Jason Chambers, Joseph Moran, Matt Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Terry L Pyles
Respondent:
Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glass v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Helen Lanee Glass
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Friend v. City of Decatur Illinois, et al
as 3:2022cv03219
Plaintiff:
Charles Friend
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois, Tyler Mahan, Cody Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Illinois River Correctional Center
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Walter Lane
Defendant:
Illinois River Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. WHO et al
as 1:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Paul Wilkerson
Defendant:
WHO, CDC, Bill Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Ishrak et al
as 2:2021cv02126
Defendant:
Martha Geoff and Omar Ishrak
Plaintiff:
Dustin M Lane
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Lane v. Adesanya et al
as 3:2021cv03051
Defendant:
. Patricia, . Kayira and Tim Adesanya
Plaintiff:
Terrell M Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
