Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Williams v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv05477
Plaintiff:
Demarko Deion Williams
Defendant:
The People of the State of Illinois, Kimberly M Foxx, Alan J Spellberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv04970
Plaintiff:
Siamone Nicholle Pollard
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and DuPage County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broomfield v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv50259
Plaintiff:
Henry Broomfield
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Sonya Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. People
as 1:2022cv03364
Petitioner:
Rickie T. Nichols
Respondent:
People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv05460
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul, Nichols and State of Illinois
Petitioner:
Clarence Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Wexford Health Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04772
Defendant:
Dr. Marlene Henze, Wexford Health Inc., Terry Nicholls and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Nicholes et al
as 1:2020cv01359
Plaintiff:
Leo Foster
Defendant:
Davis, John Baldwin, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Axon Body Worn Camera et al
as 1:2019cv06638
Defendant:
Doug Klint, Detective Perriwe, Eduardo Echevarria and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Nichols et al
as 1:2019cv05550
Plaintiff:
Alexander Taylor
Defendant:
Reggie Nichols and Autry Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Kennedy
as 1:2019cv02124
Respondent:
Director Department of Corrections, Terri Kennedy, Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois and others
Petitioner:
Demetrius H Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
