Cases 21 - 30 of 829,137
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
PLUMBERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 130, U.A. et al v. AAFAC Services, Inc
as 1:2024cv04681
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 130, U.A., Local 130, U.A. Plumbers Welfare Fund, The Trust Fund For Apprentice And Journeyman Education And Training, Local 130 UA and others
Defendant:
AAFAC Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Erbil Yogurt, Inc. v. Culture Food, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04656
Plaintiff:
Erbil Yogurt, Inc.
Defendant:
Culture Food, Inc. and Faraidoon Nanakaliy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE subscriber assigned IP address: 73.51.121.150
as 1:2024cv04666
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address: 73.51.121.150
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Eric L Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Pizer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L Pizer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
PETERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PETERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLEMONS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH JO CLEMONS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crestbrook Insurance Company a/s/o Central Prairie Co-Op v. Ecolab Inc
as 6:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Crestbrook Insurance Company a/s/o Central Prairie Co-Op
Defendant:
Ecolab Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
