Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Gill v. Lamb et al
as 1:2016cv10026
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gill
Defendant:
Nicholas Lamb, Danyal Jefferson, M. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. John Does 1-5 et al
as 1:2016cv07778
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gill
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Randy Pfister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07252
Plaintiff:
Calvin Klein Trademark Trust and Calvin Klein, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, Li Pinglong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Moore v. O'Reilly et al
as 1:2016cv06667
Plaintiff:
Darryl Moore
Defendant:
Gregory W O'Reilly, Allan Sincox, Ingrid Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Pfister et al
as 1:2016cv05160
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gill
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, John Doe, William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford et al v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01663
Plaintiff:
Linda Bradford
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Phyllis Gill , John Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv01671
Plaintiff:
Dazarine Woods and Melvin C Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Phyllis Gill , Darius West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv09162
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Gill
Defendant:
Lee, Tom Dart and Cook County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Hofbrauhaus Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv09028
Plaintiff:
Gene A. Willingham
Defendant:
Hofbrauhaus Chicago, Chicago District Office, Chef Haus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. Butler et al
as 1:2015cv08038
Petitioner:
Linsford Gill
Respondent:
Kimberly Butler and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
