Cases 121 - 130 of 2,824
ROMERO-BENUMEA v. USA
as 1:2009cv01104
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
REYMUNDO ROMERO-BENUMEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PARKS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2009cv01083
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY PARKS
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK v. LESTER HOLDING'S, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01089
Plaintiff:
ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
LESTER HOLDING'S, LLC, MIDWEST CAPITAL FUNDING PARTNERS, LLC, PREMIER CAPITAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
FOTRELL v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01078
Petitioner:
ERIC D. FOTRELL, SR.
Respondent:
WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOCKARD v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, IN et al
as 4:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
JAMIE N. LOCKARD
Defendant:
THE CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, IN, BRIAN MILLER, DEARBORN COUNTY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VARIOUS PERSONAL PROPERTY
as 1:2009cv01073
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VARIOUS PERSONAL PROPERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DEATON et al v. BRAY et al
as 1:2009mc00133
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEATON
Defendant:
DWAYNE KEITH BRAY, SR, REBECCA KAY BRAY, MICHELLE WATERFIELD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
