Cases 81 - 90 of 2,229
HOLBROOK v. STATE OF MICHIGAN
as 1:2022cv01293
Petitioner:
CHARLES HOLBROOK
Respondent:
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITMIRE v. TERRI et al
as 1:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
JACOB W. WHITMIRE
Defendant:
TERRI, LONNIE and DYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. ALL MEDICAL DOCTORS & STAFF NURSES et al
as 1:2022cv01254
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. COLLINS
Defendant:
ALL MEDICAL DOCTORS & STAFF NURSES, HUBER, Sergeant ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERWHITE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
CHRIS EDWARD SATTERWHITE
Defendant:
BRENT MILLER, KEVIN DREW, FRANK NEWKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMANO v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
DEREK ROMANO
Defendant:
DENNIS REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL, JR. v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HALL, JR.
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., CORRECTIONAL LIEUTENANT FARR and CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT KLEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY ALI v. LIEBEL et al
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
MUFTI ABDUL EL MALIK BEY ALI
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, K. CONKLIN, ISMAEL ALEEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHARRIS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01197
Petitioner:
GLEN A. PHARRIS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
HERBERT E. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOUT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01181
Petitioner:
JOHN STOUT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
