Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Richard Young
Cases 11 - 20 of 21,650
RICE v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff: JEFFREY RICE
Defendant: CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, K. DANIELS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALVARADO v. SMOOT et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff: JOSHUA ISAAC ALVARADO
Defendant: MATTHEW SMOOT and PRUITT TRUCKING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WALTERS et al v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff: LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant: KERRY J. FORRESTAL, VASQUEZ, T. JADRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff: JOSHUA S. STEPHENS
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant: CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GREER v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: DONALD C. GREER
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
EARP et al v. PANNELL et al
as 1:2024cv00632
Plaintiff: HEATHER M. EARP and KATHLEEN BARDEN
Defendant: RANDY A. PANNELL and CHAMPION CARGO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WATSON v. BINFORD
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff: JAMES WATSON
Defendant: MATTHEW BINFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?