Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Richard Young
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,991
LANNAN v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00210
Petitioner: KEVIN LANNAN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. GALE et al
as 1:2023cv02131
Plaintiff: CORY DAVID BROWN
Defendant: GALE, MAVES, COREY VALDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2023cv02120
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
Defendant: ELIZABETH JOHNSON, GALIPEAU and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02093
Plaintiff: LARRY WARREN
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE, CHLOE WARGNY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. WRIGHT
as 3:2023cv00204
Petitioner: QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Respondent: SHANNON K. WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff: RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR.
Defendant: SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVID v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02084
Petitioner: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent: JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HOOD v. DOC et al
as 1:2023cv02048
Plaintiff: DERRICK HOOD, JR.
Defendant: DOC, IVC and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BORGES
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff: LARRY E. HILL
Defendant: LISA BORGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VALES v. OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv02045
Plaintiff: LAMONT VALES
Defendant: OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?