Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Sarah Barker
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WOODS v. REAGEL
as 1:2024cv00511
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent: REAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MICHAELS v. USA
as 4:2024cv00050
Petitioner: THOMAS WAYNE MICHAELS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MCCLUSKY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2024cv00496
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY MCCLUSKY
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant: MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff: LOREN D. GARY
Defendant: INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER, LISA HAMBLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?