Cases 11 - 20 of 8,908
WIGGINTON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WIGGINTON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. ODELL
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. HOOD
Defendant:
SAMUEL ODELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHODES et al v. JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. RHODES and SHARON YOUNG
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION, JEFFERSON ENGINEERS OFFICE, MUNICIPALITY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES OF JEFFERSONVILLE INDIANA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROLLER v. EXCENTUS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
LESLIE ROLLER
Defendant:
EXCENTUS CORPORATION and VIBES MEDIA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Farahan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SNAY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
JOHN SNAY
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
