Cases 11 - 20 of 8,918
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
as 1:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE, INDIANASTATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS and CEMENT MASONS HEALTH, WELFARE, PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
SEGLER CONCRETE FINISHING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
DIAZ v. LOS RANCHEROS PIKE, INC et al
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Oscar Meneses Diaz
Defendant:
Los Rancheros Pike, Inc and Jorge Arciniega
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SIMEON v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
ROSENA SIMEON
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SCHREGARDUS et al v. DYNAMIC EXTRUSION, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
JAMES SCHREGARDUS and MARK ABBETT
Defendant:
DYNAMIC EXTRUSION, LLC, WILLIAM MCMEANS and TRACIE MCCMEANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
