Cases 41 - 50 of 21,695
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GADDIS v. DULAP et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
JAMAR GADDIS
Defendant:
DULAP, JAIL COMMANDER, BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITHEY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
JAMIE NICOLE SMITHEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ALVARADO v. SMOOT et al
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ISAAC ALVARADO
Defendant:
MATTHEW SMOOT and PRUITT TRUCKING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WALTERS et al v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, VASQUEZ, T. JADRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RICE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, K. DANIELS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPHENS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA S. STEPHENS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant:
CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
