Cases 71 - 80 of 1,833
PARKER v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. PARKER
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA, CLARK DIETZ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GRAHAM v. BOREK
as 1:2021cv03124
Plaintiff:
BRYANT L. GRAHAM
Defendant:
ROSEMARY L. BOREK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA v. NORTHSIDE ANESTHESIA SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2021cv02748
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA
Defendant:
NORTHSIDE ANESTHESIA SERVICES, LLC
TERRY v. ANDY MOHR AVON NISSAN, INC.
as 1:2021cv02647
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Terry
Defendant:
Andy Mohr Avon Nissan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSTIA v. RN STAFF INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
MA. LUISA RUSTIA
Defendant:
RN STAFF INC. and MANUEL GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY COURT IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL
as 1:2021mc00076
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FAMILY COURT IN JERUSALEM, ISRAEL
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GARRISON v. THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN, FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD
as 1:2021cv02461
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY GENE GARRISON
Defendant:
THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN, FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM CZECH REPUBLIC
as 1:2021mc00075
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM CZECH REPUBLIC
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LEE et al v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 4:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lee and Randell Lee
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION doing business as PHH MORTGAGE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. MAJCHROWICZ et al
as 1:2021cv02238
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHERYL MAJCHROWICZ, AMY BENSEMA and PAUL PORACKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
