Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SNYDER v. DCS et al
as 1:2022cv01154
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE E. SNYDER
Defendant:
DCS, AUBREY JENKINS, SUZANNE CONGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
SNYDER v. JENKINS et al
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE E. SNYDER
Defendant:
AUBREY JENKINS, SUZANNE CONGER, KAREN LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
SNYDER v. JENKINS et al
as 1:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE E. SNYDER
Defendant:
AUBREY JENKINS, SUZANNE CONGER, KAREN LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
WADE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv02475
Defendant:
DAVID REED, Jacob May, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY KEVIN WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REES v. REIFEL et al
as 1:2015cv01339
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN REES
Defendant:
KERRI L. REIFEL, STEVEN T. SECOR and HEIDI VANZEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LUEDTKE v. LUEDTKE-THOMSEN
as 1:2012cv00750
Petitioner:
NATHAN WILLIAM LUEDTKE
Respondent:
HEIDI WYN LUEDTKE-THOMSEN
In Re:
THE APPLICATION OF NATHAN WILLIAM LUEDTKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BREWINGTON v. NEGANGARD et al
as 1:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BREWINGTON
Defendant:
EDWARD J. CONNOR, DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA, JOHN DOES, 1 THROUGH 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARLEY et al v. GARGANO et al
as 1:2010cv01585
Defendant:
MIKE CARR, PATRICIA CASANOVA and MICHAEL GARGANO
Plaintiff:
D. F., E. F. and HEIDI FARLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
