Cases 11 - 20 of 98
MYNATT v. PHFLEEGER et al
as 2:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
PHFLEEGER, ASHBY, GREATHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT et al v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT and GREATHOUSE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, PHFLEEGER, ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00109
Petitioner:
JULIS EVANS
Respondent:
D. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHEELER v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
ZATECKY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS et al v. COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EVANS and JOSHUA D. HALL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. LEOHR et al
as 2:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
EDRICK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MR. LEOHR, A. LEDFORD, A VENSCHOYCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KARP v. EVANS
as 1:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. KARP
Defendant:
CHAD EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
BRUCE EVANS
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EVANS v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv00222
Petitioner:
BRUCE EVANS
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
