Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv02978
Plaintiff:
JAYME SMITH
Defendant:
COLTIN CLARK, PATTY CLOUSE, LIND L. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOSSETT v. COX et al
as 2:2021cv00209
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, D.O. KRISTA COX, LAUREN DEWLEN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENDA DOSSETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HERBERT v. STOUT et al
as 2:2020cv00283
Defendant:
JAMIE LOUGHLIN, JULIE STOUT, MICHAEL NATALIE and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HERBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARCHANT v. NATALIE et al
as 2:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN MARCHANT
Defendant:
VANCE RAHAM, T. AULER, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
KIEARA R. CARTER
Defendant:
CORIZON INC., MICHAEL NATALIE, KEITH NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2016cv00275
Defendant:
BUCHANAN, FARRAH BUNCH, MAJOR CARBB and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAVENPORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, FINOTE ASFAW, BRYAN BULLER and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BRYAN BULLER, FARRAH BUNCH and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2014cv00836
Respondent:
GRACE BROWN, CORIZON HEALTH, AARON CUNNINGHAM and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRY v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2013cv00397
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BYER, CORIZON HEALTH CARE and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
