Cases 1 - 10 of 48
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
DEVON POWELL
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMERSON, POWELL, ANDERSON, JAMES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
JERRY EMERSON, DAMON POWELL, CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. ZATECKY
as 2:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
TYRONE POWELL
Respondent:
DASHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MICKLES v. MANNER et al
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
LISA MANNER, AARON REYNOLDS, DARYL D. SOUTPAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MICKLES v. PARKER et al
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
NGHIA PARKER, PATRICE POWELL, BRITTANY HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MICKLES v. ROMONOV et al
as 2:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
JOSH ROMONOV, LISA MANNER, HELINA PRIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICKLES et al v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES, NGHIA PARKER, PATRICE POWELL and others
Defendant:
TERRI HARRIS, CORDOVA, GALLERIA MALL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ANDERSON v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv01153
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, MR POWELL and ALSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
DEVON POWELL
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
