Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 91 - 100 of 71,442
SCOTT v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff: EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant: ALLEN, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANDSTAR RANGER, INC. v. SOOTS
as 1:2024cv00893
Plaintiff: LANDSTAR RANGER, INC.
Defendant: TREVOR DEAN SOOTS
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
SPEECH FIRST, INC v. WHITTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Plaintiff: SPEECH FIRST, INC
Defendant: PAMELA WHITTEN, LAMAR HYLTON, KATHY ADAMS RIESTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00892
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00895
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00902
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOORE v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2024cv00899
Plaintiff: REONTE C. MOORE
Defendant: JASON ERNEST, MARTIN and D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE, JR. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00894
Plaintiff: JOHN A. PIERCE, JR.
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
YATES v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00903
Plaintiff: JAMES YATES
Defendant: HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE BLOOMINGTON CARE CENTER, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, INC. and GGNSC BLOOMINGTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?