Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,364
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff: ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant: DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff: AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant: CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
REDWINE v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: SHAWN M. REDWINE
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC, ANDREW MOWERY and REID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02219
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ANDREWS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02202
Plaintiff: CASSEY J. ANDREWS
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VANSICKLE v. RETTER et al
as 2:2023cv00466
Plaintiff: ZACHARY R. VANSICKLE
Defendant: RANDY RETTER, STAFF and ANDREW ABNEY-BROTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?