Cases 11 - 20 of 21
HAINES v. BLITON et al
as 4:2019cv00245
Defendant:
JASON BLITON and KENNY FREEMAN
Plaintiff:
JAREL T. HAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAINES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03557
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INC, et al, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY HAINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HAINES v. FREEMAN et al
as 4:2019cv00165
Plaintiff:
JAREL T. HAINES
Defendant:
MATT FLETCHER, JASON BLITON, JENNINGS COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAINES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03161
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C. HAINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAINES v. CENTRAL PROCESSING CORP. PLAN et al
as 1:2017cv01220
Defendant:
CENTRAL PROCESSING CORP. PLAN and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL HAINES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HAINES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv02742
Petitioner:
JAREL T. HAINES
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAINES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv01362
Petitioner:
JAREL HAINES
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAINES v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv01273
Petitioner:
JAREL T. HAINES
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAINES v. ADECCO USA, INC
as 1:2013cv00689
Defendant:
ADECCO USA, INC
Plaintiff:
PAULA K. HAINES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
