Cases 11 - 20 of 348
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Defendant:
J. KALLIS, OFFICER JANE DOE, SAJNAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RUBY v. STILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
CARRIE STILLER, WILLIAM GRAY, AMANDA C. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBY v. GAINS et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY RUBY
Defendant:
RONNIE GAINS, NEW ALBANY POLICE DEPT., BRIDGET ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. LEOHR et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PARKER
Defendant:
MATT LEOHR, A. MOSELEY and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE et al v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY - BLOOMINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY - BLOOMINGTON, LIBBY SPOTTS, GRETCHEN HANDLOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
ORR v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, B. LALOUX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2023cv02323
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JANE DOE, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
