Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RAMOS v. BLANKENSHIP et al
as 1:2011cv00900
Defendant:
LUTHER BLANKENSHIP, SCOTT LIVINGSTON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL COMMANDER, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MAROCKA RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00806
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
REID v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL ADMIN, et al
as 1:2010cv00522
Defendant:
LUTHER J BLANTON, BOWLING, CONNIE DALE and others
Plaintiff:
AARON ELL REID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEBAMOFF ENTERPRISES, INC. et al v. SNOW
as 1:2009cv00744
Plaintiff:
LEBAMOFF ENTERPRISES, INC., LEBAMOFF ENTERPRISES, INC., RANDY LEWANDOWSKI and others
Defendant:
P. THOMAS SNOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
GRAY v. MIZE
as 1:2009cv00344
Petitioner:
LUTHER GRAY
Respondent:
BRETT MIZE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRAY v. HALL et al
as 1:2008cv01296
Plaintiff:
LUTHER GRAY
Defendant:
REV. STEPHEN HALL, EDWIN G. BASS, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRAY v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2008cv00263
Plaintiff:
LUTHER GRAY
Defendant:
PAUL A. TALBOT, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and DIANA ELROD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
