Cases 11 - 18 of 18
VERBERG v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2013cv00418
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VERBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FLORES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2012cv01682
Petitioner:
ERIC FLORES
Respondent:
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01535
Defendant:
ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FIRST BANK & TRUST, SB v. NICOL et al
as 2:2011cv00300
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GIBSON COUNTY COAL, LLC, ROBERT D. NICOL and others
Plaintiff:
FIRST BANK & TRUST, SB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
THE NEW WASHINGTON STATE BANK v. PYKE et al
as 4:2010cv00038
Defendant:
B & J PRINTING, INC., CITIMORTGAGE, INC., INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
THE NEW WASHINGTON STATE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
POLICHEMI v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2009cv00235
Petitioner:
JOSEPH POLICHEMI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ERIC HOLDER, US BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GROSS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.
as 2:2008cv00449
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GROSS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00197
Petitioner:
JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
