Cases 21 - 30 of 57
GUDINO et al v. HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
LESHA CREEK and RAYMOND GUDINO
Defendant:
KEVIN HALE, HAMILTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JARROD HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04052
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. HALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KNIGHT, JR v. HALE et al
as 1:2017cv02965
Defendant:
WEBSTER CAMPBELL, MARK DEICHMAN, MARK HALE and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY DEAN KNIGHT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAYMOND HALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00674
Petitioner:
SHANNON HALE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOKE v. LUX et al
as 1:2017cv00589
IMPD:
Z. CARVER, S. FOLEY, W. HALE and others
Plaintiff:
JAHRAD L. COOKE
Defendant:
MATTHEW KUBACKI and MICHAEL LUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SCHRODER v. MADISON JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 4:2016cv00121
Defendant:
DERRICK BRIGHTWELL, DOES 1-10, TIM GREATHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
LILIAN KARENA SCHRODER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv01834
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HALE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALE v. AUTOVEST LLC
as 1:2015cv01809
Defendant:
AUTOVEST LLC
Plaintiff:
DEVIN HALE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
