Cases 21 - 30 of 106
FIELDS v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
JACONIAH FIELDS
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, DEBORAH HALL and BRANDON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
GOLDEN-FIELDS v. PATTON
as 1:2021cv02924
Plaintiff:
NICKI GOLDEN-FIELDS
Defendant:
THERESA PATTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTSLAR et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
DELBERT S. GADDIS, III, AARON MATTINGLY, CODY FIELDS and others
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARMER v. HAMMOND POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant:
CHRISTISON, ANTHONY ADAMS, DANIAL MITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIELDS v. WARDEN
as 1:2021cv01528
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
GREGORY P. FIELDS, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATSON v. MANGAS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00305
Defendant:
JULIAN CENTER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
KELLIE R. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADVANCED TURF SOLUTIONS INC v. PARENT et al
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant:
H&K SPORTS FIELDS, LLC and MICHAEL J. PARENT
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED TURF SOLUTIONS INC and ADVANCED TURF SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIELDS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02968
Plaintiff:
HEATHER FIELDS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FIELDS-BEY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 1:2020cv02871
Defendant:
REBECCA R. DAVIS, MICHELLE LAFLOWER and WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC.
Plaintiff:
TONY E. FIELDS-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
