Cases 21 - 30 of 120
MOORE v. CHAVIS
as 1:2022cv01783
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN M.T. CHAVIS, MELISSICA FLIPPEN, ALEYNE WOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BLANTON v. LITTLEJOHN et al
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH C.J. BLANTON
Defendant:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, DAN MITCHELL, NATHAN LAGENOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Megan Roberts, MEGAN L. ROBERTS and JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
INC. COOK GROUP, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WARD et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ELONZO WARD
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY: CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT VIGO COUNTY COURT, VIGO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT: JUVENILE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
WOODARD v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2021cv02813
Plaintiff:
CARLOS WOODARD
Defendant:
MEGAN MORGAN and HENDRICKS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESCOTT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02697
Plaintiff:
MEGAN PRESCOTT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRITT v. WEXFORD et al
as 1:2021cv01889
Defendant:
DAVIS, DELK, COURTNY and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. PRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
