Cases 21 - 30 of 1,676
THOMPSON v. HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N. THOMPSON
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NICK SMITH, PAUL BICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
HARVEY v. GEO AND ITS GUARDS et al
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
HAROLD HARVEY
Defendant:
GEO AND ITS GUARDS, MURPHY, MIKE SCHIDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. COUSINS and MICHAEL S. COLLINS
Defendant:
MARK SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al v. SMITH, JR.
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
S.T. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMIE K. SMITH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
NICKOLAS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
