Cases 21 - 30 of 165
HATTON v. BLACK et al
as 1:2020cv02775
Defendant:
MARSHALL COUNTY and TOM A. BLACK
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROACTIVE MEASURES USA, LLC et al v. D'ANGELO et al
as 1:2020cv02496
Counter Defendant:
PROACTIVE MEASURES USA, LLC and COURTNEY CLARK
Counter Claimant:
TOM D'ANGELO
Defendant:
FOCAN, LLC and F.O.CAN, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRAZIER v. TIPTON CITY OF et al
as 1:2020cv02419
Defendant:
TIPTON CITY OF, THOMAS DOLEZAL, JOE BITNER and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD FRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ESTATE OF MARY LOU BUCK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02062
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MARY LOU BUCK, TOM BUCK, ROBERT BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MINOR v. JEFFERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2020cv00154
Defendant:
DARIN VAUGHN, TOM O'NEIL, JEFFERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
RALPH TYROME MINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VERMILLION v. FRANCUM et al
as 1:2020cv01674
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, CHARLES HOUCHINS, TOM FRANCUM and others
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOM JAMES COMPANY et al v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2020cv01415
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN CLOTHING COMPANY, TOM JAMES CHILE S.A., INDIVIDUALIZED SHIRT COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HAINES v. FREEMAN et al
as 4:2019cv00272
Plaintiff:
JAREL T. HAINES
Defendant:
TOM WEBSTER, SHERIFF W. KENNY FREEMAN and KYLE LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04300
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
