Cases 21 - 30 of 171
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06924
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NELSON v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B. NELSON, III
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE and VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAFFETT v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GENE MAFFETT
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, RANDY STOKES, NURSING STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY ALI v. LIEBEL et al
as 1:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
MUFTI ABDUL EL MALIK BEY ALI
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, K. CONKLIN, ISMAEL ALEEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUFORD v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIE BUFORD, III
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HUDSON et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02798
Plaintiff:
The ESTATE of Willie Hudson, Jr., WILLIE HUDSON, JR. and AMOY CHONG HUDSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOFTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02372
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LOFTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
HARRIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02312
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HARRIS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS v. SYKES et al
as 1:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant:
DIANE S. SYKES, WILLIAM J. BAUER, JOEL M. FLAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
