Cases 31 - 38 of 38
MENDOZA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03220
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DELIA MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, CAPTAIN, JOHN CARAWAY and others
Recruited Counsel:
ONI N. HARTON, JOHN MALEY and LADENE MENDOZA
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MENDOZA-VARGAS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2016cv00048
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, SAMUEL J. BYRD, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
EFREN MENDOZA-VARGAS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMUNDSEN et al v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01484
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. ADAMCHICK, JAMES HENERY AMUNDSEN, GOLDIE FAYE ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MENDOZA v. USA
as 1:2015cv01208
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MENDOZA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MENDOZA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00701
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MENDOZA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ACCESS THERAPIES, INC. v. MENDOZA
as 1:2013cv01317
Counter Defendant:
ACCESS THERAPIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
ACCESS THERAPIES, INC.
Third Party Defendant:
HARVINDER DHANI, EUGENE GARCIA, MANUEL GARCIA and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
ERIKSON MENDOZA
Counter Claimant:
ERIKSON MENDOZA
Defendant:
ERIKSON MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
MENDOZA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00018
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MENDOZA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
