Cases 31 - 40 of 140
BENNETT v. MARION COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv02967
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. DREES et al
as 2:2021cv00377
Plaintiff:
JAMONTRAE BENNETT
Defendant:
BILL DREES and BRAD FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant:
HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUALITY IMPORTERS TRADING COMPANY, LLC v. SLATE et al
as 1:2021cv01783
Defendant:
IAN BENNETT and MICHAEL SLATE
Plaintiff:
QUALITY IMPORTERS TRADING COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
HOOPER v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2021cv01637
Defendant:
JAYMISON TYLER BENNETT, FRANK VANIHEL and BRANDON ISON
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01324
Plaintiff:
QUINTON SMITH, QUINTON JERMAINE SMITH and BETTY BENNETT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. DAVIES COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 1:2021cv00942
Defendant:
CITY OF WASHINGTON, INDIANA, KEITH HINDERLITER, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JOHNSON and DOES pro se
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENNETT v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00869
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN BENNETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
MARCUM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00428
Defendant:
SUNIL THOLPADY, JEFFERY BENNETT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MARCUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SMITH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv00373
Defendant:
MARTIN, PRICE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
