Cases 31 - 38 of 38
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2010cv01367
Defendant:
ROBERT HANCOCK, THELMA G. HANCOCK and TERRY G. ROE
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
R. v. WILLIAM PENN ELEMENTARY #49 et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Defendant:
RHONDA AKERS, JANE DOE, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHNELL et al v. BINDLEY et al
as 3:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SCHNELL, UNKNOWN JOHN DOE #'S 1-1000 and UNKNOWN JANE DOE #'S 1-1000
Defendant:
ROBERT E. BINDLEY, WHITAKER, RICHARD GUNSELMAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY IN REHABILITATION v. CT ACQUISITION CORP. et al
as 1:2008cv00531
Plaintiff:
FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY IN REHABILITATION
Defendant:
CT ACQUISITION CORP., JOHN EVANS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., J. ROE HITCHCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROE v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2008cv00167
Plaintiff:
JESSE JOE ROE
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and MATTHEW JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO. v. SULLIVAN FUNDING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01279
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO.
Defendant:
SULLIVAN FUNDING GROUP, INC., MORTGAGE FUNDING GROUP, INC., LANCE L. LACONI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROE et al v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2007cv00962
Plaintiff:
JESSE JOE ROE, BROWNIE SALMONS, JAMES FORD and others
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, TEENA HATFIELD and JASON FORSYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO. v. SULLIVAN FUNDING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00383
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO.
Defendant:
SULLIVAN FUNDING GROUP, INC., ALPINE FINANCIAL, INC., LANCE L. LACONI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
