Cases 41 - 50 of 175
NAYLOR v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYKES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRYANT L. SYKES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and NUMI CARDHOLDER SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STONE
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, M. BRYANT, TIM GREATHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. LIEDTK et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIEDTK, WEXFORD LLC/CENTURION, REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. URS MIDWEST INC. D/B/A URS et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
BRYANT GRAHAM
Defendant:
URS MIDWEST INC. D/B/A URS and TREVOR C. LYNHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ESLICK v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02415
Plaintiff:
RYAN LEE ESLICK
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, WILLIAM WILSON, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2022cv02244
Plaintiff:
KEITH LEE BRYANT
Defendant:
ANDREA FRANKLIN, CONSTANCE SCHMITT, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BRYANT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
TYRUS BRYANT
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, SMITH, SIMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
