Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
WOODARD v. HOGSETT et al
as 1:2011cv01301
Defendant:
PAT CASANOVA, MOLLY CHAMBERLIN, LISA CLIFFORD and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL WOODARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
CLIFFORD v. PROGRESSIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2009cv01151
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLIFFORD, KEVIN CLIFFORD and KEVIN CLIFFORD
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WOODARD v. MORRISON et al
as 1:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
CAROL WOODARD
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MORRISON, WINFIELD ONG, MICHAEL WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LACKEY v. LANNAN
as 3:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P. LACKEY
Defendant:
CLIFFORD J. LANNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BRAZIL v. MARBERRY
as 2:2009cv00099
Petitioner:
OZEL CLIFFORD BRAZIL
Respondent:
H. J. MARBERRY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR-BEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv01671
Plaintiff:
TYREESE TAYLOR-BEY, ALBERT AMOS-EL, CLIFFORD WILBOURN-EL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
