Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 640
GABBARD v. PIECZONKA
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff: MATTHEW RYAN GABBARD
Defendant: CARL S. PIECZONKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIGGIN v. ASHER et al
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff: TROY SHONTA LIGGIN
Defendant: JERRY ASHER, MATTHEW DECKER and ROBIN BYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff: MATTHEW LAWSON
Defendant: NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/GEO, JOHN M. NWANNUNU and CENTURION MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GABBARD v. PIERZONKA
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff: MATTHEW RYAN GABBARD
Defendant: CARL S. PIERZONKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
PUGH v. MISCHLER
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Defendant: ANN SMITH MISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLASS v. ASHER et al
as 1:2023cv00712
Plaintiff: CRAIG GLASS
Defendant: JERRY ASHER, MATTHEW DECKARD and ANDREA STONESTREET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZOOK v. ZATECKY
as 1:2023cv00653
Petitioner: MATTHEW ZOOK
Respondent: ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHAL et al v. AMERICAN TACTICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00655
Plaintiff: GURINDER JOHAL, DILJOT SEKHON, MARY CAROL WEISERT and others
Defendant: AMERICAN TACTICAL, INC., ANTHONY DICHARIO, JOSEPH CALABRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BEELER v. USA
as 2:2023cv00165
Petitioner: MATTHEW BEELER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HICKS v. PARKE COUNTY, IN SHERIFFS DEPT
as 2:2023cv00147
Plaintiff: DEREK MATTHEW HICKS
Defendant: PARKE COUNTY, IN SHERIFFS DEPT. and MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?