Cases 51 - 60 of 64
JOHNSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv00181
Defendant:
MIKE BARNES, RICHARD BROWN, M. GADBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv00173
Defendant:
MIKE BARNES, RICHARD BROWN, M. GADBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COPPER v. GADBERRY et al
as 2:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. COPPER
Defendant:
MARLA GADBERRY, HAYNES, ESTER HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLANUEVA v. IDOC/ISF et al
as 2:2013cv00145
Defendant:
CORIZON, ESTHER HINTON, IDOC/ISF and others
Plaintiff:
JUVENCIO VILLANUEVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HINTON v. USA
as 3:2013cv00108
Petitioner:
MARCELLUS HINTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SISK v. OSBURN et al
as 2:2013cv00122
Defendant:
SGT. ARNOLD, OFFICER BLUE, OFFICER BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHADWICK v. BLOUNT et al
as 1:2012cv01765
Defendant:
L. BLOUNT, ROBERT BURNS, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN CHADWICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BROWN-EL v. RENNER et al
as 1:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Noble WENDELL BROWN-EL
Defendant:
JENOLA HINTON, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and MARK RENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLBERT v. RICHARDS et al
as 2:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
HEZEKIAH JOEL COLBERT
Defendant:
B. HINTON and K. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
