Cases 61 - 70 of 76
HART v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.
as 1:2011cv01500
Plaintiff:
ERIC HART
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOLLOWAY v. GRAY et al
as 1:2011cv01267
Defendant:
STEVE CROOKE, ANTHONY GATTO, RONALD GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CURTRINA HOLLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAFFER v. WHALING et al
as 2:2011cv00180
Defendant:
JANE DOE, SHERIFF RUSTY HART and OFFICER WHALING
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS USA, INC. v. ASTROCOSMOS METALLURGICAL, INC. et al
as 3:2011mc00005
Defendant:
ASTROCOSMOS METALLURGICAL, INC. and CARBONE LORRAINE EQUIPMENTS GENIE CHIMIQUE
Material Witne:
Randall J. Hart
Plaintiff:
MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS USA, INC.
HART v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00043
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
MELVIN A. HART
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HART v. MANNINA et al
as 1:2010cv01691
Defendant:
GREGORY BALLARD, WILLIAM BENJAMIN, JEFF BREEDLOVE and others
Plaintiff:
CARLTON HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. GEORGE et al
as 1:2010cv01094
Defendant:
DAVID M. GEORGE, ROBYN R. GEORGE, HART FINANCIAL and others
Plaintiff:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CHRISMAN v. BORBES et al
as 1:2009cv01108
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOUGLAS CHRISMAN
Defendant:
LISA BORBES, PATRICIA GUILLFORD, MARC T. ROTHENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
