Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00730
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02804
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ANKH EL v. RAY SKILLMAN WESTSIDE IMPORTS INC et al
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Defendant:
VINCE FREEMAN, CHRISTOPHER MUHNEY and RAY SKILLMAN WESTSIDE IMPORTS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. IVIE et al
as 1:2015cv01896
Defendant:
FREEMAN FAMILY FUNERAL HOME, CAROLYN IVIE and JACK IVIE
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
FREEMAN v. MARCHIONNE
as 1:2015cv01799
Plaintiff:
LEWIS GENE FREEMAN
Defendant:
SERGIO MARCHIONNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
FREEMAN v. IDOC et al
as 1:2015cv00532
Defendant:
DAVID BARR, IDOC, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUELLER v. CITY OF GREENFIELD et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENFIELD, CALEB FREEMAN and GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
FREEMAN v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00393
Petitioner:
JAMES FREEMAN
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
