Cases 71 - 80 of 915
JONES v. C. O. STANLEY et al
as 4:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
BRYAN JEFFREY JONES
Defendant:
C. O. STANLEY, SGT. DANGLER, SGT. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL D. JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JONES v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Respondent:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF and CIRCUIT 6 COURT MADISON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JONES
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
LE'MERE JONES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. JONES
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., TRICIA PRETORTIOUS, STINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GIBBS v. PRETORIUS et al
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEE GIBBS
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, CARRIE SIPICH, KATIE MCMAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv06948
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER JONES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
