Cases 1 - 10 of 157
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTSOCK v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HARTSOCK
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, ROBERT BUPREY, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
BARRY EDWARDS
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, CENTURION, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. MCMANN et al
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER MCMANN, CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, SGT. ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WARREN v. GOODNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Defendant:
GREG GOODNIGHT, TYLER MOORE, CITY OF KOKOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT et al
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
KEITH TOWNSEND
Defendant:
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT, STEPHEN BRAND, ADAM LEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STONE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STONE
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, M. BRYANT, TIM GREATHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. GREATHOUSE et al
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
RA'MAR DANIELS
Defendant:
TIM GREATHOUSE, DENNIS REAGLE and PATRICK THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
