Cases 1 - 10 of 28
JOHNSON et al v. KERN
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
AMY JOHNSON, TABITHA INGUEZ, TEAGEN INGUEZ and others
Defendant:
MONTE KERN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
YOUNKER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv06968
Plaintiff:
MONTE L. YOUNKER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOFFMAN v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00425
Petitioner:
MONTE HOFFMAN
Respondent:
RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HOFFMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
MONTE G HOFFMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RULE and BARNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GONZALEZ v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06738
Plaintiff:
MONTE Q. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MYERS v. EVERETT et al
as 1:2021cv01786
Defendant:
TOWN OF SUMMITVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS EVERETT, SHAWN MCGUIRE and others
Plaintiff:
Monte Myers
MAY v. CARTER, JR. et al
as 1:2020cv00542
Defendant:
MONTE A. MCDANIEL, RAYMOND KINISON, APRIL BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DARRELL MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLSEN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv04065
Defendant:
ESKENAZI HEALTH, ADKINS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW G. OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTES-VERDEUZCO v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv03205
Plaintiff:
MONTES VERDUSCO BALDEMAR and BALDEMAR MONTES-VERDUZCO
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN, GIRDLER, J. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
