Cases 1 - 10 of 1,374
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WELLS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Defendant:
CHARLIE FOX, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC., ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01153
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, ANDREW COLE, CHARLIE FOX and others
Plaintiff:
RAYSHON WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. PRETORIUS et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Defendant:
MELINDA MOSS, SERGEANT COOPER, ROBERT DUPREY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01509
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GRIMES v. HUNT et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIMES
Defendant:
HUGH HUNT, CLARK COLTOM, ANN MISCHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
500 INMATES OF THE PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, HEATHER RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01376
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
HIGGASON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01154
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE, COOPRIDER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HIGGASON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. BYRD et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
CAMPBELL JACOBS and SAMUEL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
