Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. BORDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
TYLER BORDEN, BARRETT and NOAH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. HICKS
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. RUMOR
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
DYLAN RUMOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
JAKOB M. BENNETT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLEY v. NANCREDE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02159
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K. DILLEY and MICHAEL L. BENNETT
Defendant:
NANCREDE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., CHRIS NANCREDE, AQUA INDIANA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
CALLANTINE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, ELIZABETH BENNETT, SAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR.
Defendant:
SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
