Cases 1 - 10 of 70
COMBS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. ELIS et al
as 1:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
ELIS, REAGLE, BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
DEAN COMBS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARLEY v. OWEN COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Defendant:
DWEN COUNTY INDIANA, DON VANDERMOERELL, BILL HOBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COMBS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY COMBS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
INDIANA MHC, LP v. HARRISON COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT et al
as 4:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Indiana MHC, LP
Defendant:
Harrison County Regional Sewer District, Darin Duncan, Tom Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMBS v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
SANDY A. COMBS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COMBS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06484
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE COMBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
