Cases 1 - 10 of 30
3C, LLC d/b/a 3CHI v. ROKITA
as 1:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
3C, LLC d/b/a 3CHI, MIDWEST HEMP COUNCIL, INC, MIDWEST HEMP COUNCIL, INC. and others
Defendant:
TOD ROKITA, THE STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PRINTUP v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER B. BUTLER, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. PRETORIUS
as 1:2022cv01625
Petitioner:
DARIUS MARSHALL
Respondent:
T. PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRINTUP v. SMITH et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
M. SMITH, JR., C. WAINMAN, J. JOBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. IDOC et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
IDOC, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
