Cases 1 - 10 of 59
KIRKLAND v. OMBUDSMAN BUREAU et al
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
MARTIZE KIRKLAND
Defendant:
OMBUDSMAN BUREAU, CHARLENE A. BURKETT, ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GASON ENGLISH, ARAMARK, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. GSM HOLDING, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02298
Plaintiff:
CINDY ENGLISH
Defendant:
GSM HOLDING, INC. and RAMAZ CHOKHELI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DRUCKER v. ENGLISH et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
CARL J. DRUCKER, II
Defendant:
ENGLISH, WELLINGTON, TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHELLY v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
MARZONO SHELLY
Defendant:
FISCHER, FRANK VANIHEL, NATOSHA ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, BRANDON PHERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. ENGLISH
as 1:2021cv00815
Plaintiff:
DEMONAE LEWIS
Defendant:
JASON ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TOM JAMES COMPANY et al v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2020cv01415
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN CLOTHING COMPANY, TOM JAMES CHILE S.A., INDIVIDUALIZED SHIRT COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
