Cases 1 - 10 of 63
JOHNSON et al v. AULT et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
TERRY JOHNSON and AUTUMN BREEZE JOHNSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW AULT, SHAWNA AULT, CITY OF VINCENNES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NUNLEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
WALTER J. NUNLEY
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS, BRADLEY HAMMOND, ROBERT ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HAMMONDS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
DALE L. HAMMONDS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HAMMOND v. BILLING TRANSPORT LTD. et al
as 4:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
BOBBI HAMMOND
Defendant:
BILLING TRANSPORT LTD. and AMRITPAL SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HAMMOND v. SANOFI US SERVICES INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00921
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS US, INC. and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC
Plaintiff:
TRACY HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOLIS v. CONYERS et al
as 2:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
YONI SOLIS
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CONYERS, THOMAS SOLOMON, J. ERNEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ROSE
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALSIP, STAMPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINDOM v. STAMPER et al
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
AARON D. WINDOM
Defendant:
STAMPER, HAMMOND and ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRONG v. HAMMOND
as 2:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STRONG
Defendant:
B. HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WINDOM v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
AARON D. WINDOM
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALSIP, REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
