Cases 1 - 10 of 180
HAMILTON v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HAMILTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, BRADLEY DANGLER, HUNTER DUNAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HUNTER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
GRACE V. HUNTER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HUNTER, SR. v. NICHOLS et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HUNTER, SR.
Defendant:
CALVIN NICHOLS and SEBRI TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JAMES v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JAMES
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
Interested Party:
SCOTT SIMMONS, THOMAS MOFFITT, MORGAN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
