Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SOWDERS v. BYRNE et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff: BARRY JUNIOR SANDERS and BARRY JUNIOR SOWDERS
Defendant: ANDY BURNE, MIKE ISOM, KELLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 1:2021cv00580
Plaintiff: Toni Davis
Defendant: Bottomley Enterprises, Inc., Junior R. Murray and BOTTOMLEY ENTERPRISES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS v. ALLEN SUPERIOR COURT FT. WAYNE et al
as 1:2019cv04728
Defendant: THOMAS CHAILLE, TESA HELGE, GREGORY RIDENOUR and others
Plaintiff: MARVIN JUNIOR DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03463
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PHILLIPS v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00119
Respondent: J.E. KRUEGER
Petitioner: IRVIN JUNIOR PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JUNIOR v. U.S.A.
as 1:2017cv02194
Petitioner: DAVID JUNIOR
Respondent: U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JUNIOR v. USA
as 1:2016cv01590
Petitioner: DAVID JUNIOR
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GARD v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00978
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff: JUNIOR GARD
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
IVESTER v. JOHNSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00681
Petitioner: GUY JUNIOR IVESTER
Respondent: LAURIE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?