Cases 1 - 10 of 98
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAYNE v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, FONSECA, COATIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGINNIS v. MANNING et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY J. MCGINNIS
Defendant:
MANNING, MCCAFFERTY, BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DARDEN v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
JAYDEN W. DARDEN
Defendant:
KARL MARTINI, VOLGEMAN, WIEGAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2023cv01925
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
MCCAFFERTY, SHAVER, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
LAWSON ALLEN
Defendant:
LANE and WEISINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
LAWSON, SCOTT and COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE LAWSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LAWSON v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAWSON
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/GEO, JOHN M. NWANNUNU and CENTURION MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
